|
|
|
| The Forums at DirtRider.Net |
 |
|
Why only one year?
Canadian Daves JustKDX

01-25-2009, 06:55 AM
|
 |
Registered
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 53
|
|
|
Why only one year?
hello everyone, so i just got 2 kdx's about 2 weeks ago for $500 (89 & 90) and both run ya i think i got a pretty good deal. anyways my question is why did they only put inverted fork on 1993 KDX 200 did they suck or something? because I've road bikes with inverted fork and they were a lot better then standard forks so again why would they do that? thanks
|

01-25-2009, 07:06 AM
|
 |
Subscriber
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,709
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by fusion
I've road bikes with inverted fork and they were a lot better then standard forks
|
Better at what? The inverted forks tend to be better in harsher conditions while the conventional fork rides more comfortably at lower speeds.
------------------------------------------------------------------ « t a g » -----
Location: Erie, Pennsylvania
|

01-25-2009, 07:27 AM
|
 |
Registered
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 53
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by _JOE_
Better at what? The inverted forks tend to be better in harsher conditions while the conventional fork rides more comfortably at lower speeds.
|
The bikes with inverted forks handled better took jumps better and had a smoother ride imo and maybe the forks on my kdx are just worn out idk.
|

01-25-2009, 08:26 AM
|
|
Registered
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,790
|
|
|
The inverted forks on the 93 are not a huge improvement over the conventionals used other years. If you want true USD fork performance you need to swap over some USD's from a good MX bike. Most people use kx forks for this conversion.
I have the 93 model USD's on my 89. I can't say that they are all that great, but mine do need a rebuild. I'd bet you will be able to tell very little difference between handling on the two bikes, assuming that both sets of forks are in good working condition and tuned somewhat properly.
J.
|

01-25-2009, 09:25 AM
|
|
Registered
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,073
|
|
|
The USD KDX forks are on the 1993 - 1994 KDX200 and 1991 - 1994 KDX250. It is cheaper to make the conventional forks, so that may have been a consideration.
julien_d, do you have stiffer springs in your forks? When properly working with the correct springs, they are an improvement.
|

01-25-2009, 09:34 AM
|
|
Registered
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,790
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by glad2ride
The USD KDX forks are on the 1993 - 1994 KDX200 and 1991 - 1994 KDX250. It is cheaper to make the conventional forks, so that may have been a consideration.
julien_d, do you have stiffer springs in your forks? When properly working with the correct springs, they are an improvement.
|
Yes, I know there is some improvement there over the older USD's. I understand they are pretty much on par with the newer 95+ conventionals though. I do need to go over mine and check everything. I expect they'll be much better then. I have not replaced the springs. I probably weigh no more than 150lbs with gear, so I'm not sure if I should go stiffer or not.
J.
|

01-25-2009, 02:23 PM
|
|
Registered
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 638
|
|
The main advantage of USD forks over good conventional forks is their structural stiffness. You can make both work very well, but the USD units will be more precise.
Thing is, it takes a Carmichael or a Stewart to appreciate the difference. Us squids on this forum can't really utilize the improvement. 
|

01-25-2009, 03:18 PM
|
|
Registered
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,790
|
|
|
lol, true there. The USD's are known for less deflection than conventionals, as well as having a bit more clearance since they don't hang down as far below the front axle. I'm sure the way I ride I wouldn't tell much difference assuming both were in decent shape. I really need to tear mine down. I'm still trying to hunt down that appendix to the E series KDX manual where they show the service for the USD's.
J.
|

01-25-2009, 06:20 PM
|
|
Registered
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,073
|
|
|
Just "hunt down" the cash to buy the manual at your local dealer. :-)
|

01-25-2009, 11:13 PM
|
 |
Registered
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 202
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by julien_d
lol, true there. The USD's are known for less deflection than conventionals, as well as having a bit more clearance since they don't hang down as far below the front axle. I'm sure the way I ride I wouldn't tell much difference assuming both were in decent shape. I really need to tear mine down. I'm still trying to hunt down that appendix to the E series KDX manual where they show the service for the USD's.
J.
|
What do you need to know? I may still have that in my manual, and I have a spare set of '94 model USD's +triples if you want them.
------------------------------------------------------------------ « t a g » -----
2003 CRX 200 Hondasaki Hybrid
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:38 PM.
General
Reviews
For Sale
Ride
Thumpers
MX / SX
Chapters
Suspension
KDX
What Bike?
| |