
The output shaft is the transmission output shaft, which is where the front chain sprocket mounts. It has splines (ridges) that keep the sprocket turning with the shaft rather then just sitting there spinning. The previous owners of my project KDX were not kind people, and ran either the wrong sprocket on there, or ran the right one far longer than they should have. As a result, the splines were just about gone. Nothing to do but replace the transmission output shaft, which means splitting the cases and doing a complete teardown. Yours is probably fine, my was damaged by previous owner stupidity. Given how badly this bike was treated, it was probably the right thing to tear it all the way down regardless...
The part that contains the piston.
|
Originally Posted by sr5bidder
J.C. may pop his head up out of the snow and come out of hibernation for a moment and reword this for me or maybe even come up with his own set of clever anologies to better explain!
|
. I agree with SR5 strongly on the type F. My KDX likes it better than anything else. Smoother shifts, and easier to find neutral, and less clutch drag. Also on the K&N. Hang it on your garage wall as art if you want, but don't leave it in the bike. I'm not even sure why they bother making them if they can't be bothered to research the correct way to do it.|
Originally Posted by denbsteph
I like the pull right off the get go, plus thru the mids and into the top end, something different about this one, it did not appear to "top out" it kept pulling. Then again, I did not peg her in 6th gear, did not want the piston to have a melt down on me. Dennis
|
we have six gears?? I loose count from being excited I will take your word for it though
I also have many bikes and a new 4 wheeler 92' warrior (not new by far) so I really don't count gears
|
Originally Posted by sr5bidder
we have six gears?? I loose count from being excited I will take your word for it though I also have many bikes and a new 4 wheeler 92' warrior (not new by far) so I really don't count gears ![]() |
|
Originally Posted by julien_d
lol. How often do you think we hit that sixth gear @ brown?
|
. One of my regular stomping grounds. Some good spots up in WV too, for sure.
|
Originally Posted by denbsteph
julien_d: It goes away when I engage the clutch, I hear it on the side of the clutch, any reason to be concerned? Does the KIPS rattle all the way thru the motor? Dennis
|
|
Originally Posted by denbsteph
sr5: I'm waiting on the shop manual, but since you have given some insight on what to look for, I'll give her a whirl tomorrow evening. What have you heard personally about the Boyesson Rad Valve? I'm narrowing my parts wish list down and was looking at the Boyesson reeds. Part list as follow.
Weisco piston and rings of course Uni Filter FMF gnarly Rev pipe (looking hard at it) Reed valves (possibly Rad Valve) not looking to make her fast in the top end, trying to keep the low end grunt established, love that pulling thru the mid range. |
|
Originally Posted by denbsteph
We haven't been to H & M because alot of us are packing and like to drink a beer here and there. I have heard, never experienced it, but they have Motorcycle cops (so to speak) that check your bike. We usaully ride the coal reclaims, ride into Welch. Average mileage per day is 50 miles. It's dangerous up there but it's fun. Hopefully this year I can get the KDX up there. The Honda runs well up there, I give all those big bore bikes and four wheelers hell. I'll download some pics later today. Dennis
|
|
Originally Posted by jb_dallas
Thats what alot of people say, but it really depends on the bikes purpose. Its really hard to beat the woods pipe for tight, technical trails. That is the main reason I havent bought a desert pipe...I dont want to sacrifice much bottom end for top end. Why spend the $200 for a rev pipe if the guy only wants low end power?
|
| Its important to note that because of differences in port timing the KDX200 and 220 don't react the same to each pipe. Both the FMF pipes and the Pro Circuit pipe were originally designed to be used on the KDX200. Installing a Torque pipe on a KDX200 will improve performance over the stock pipe from idle to wide open throttle. However installing a torque pipe on a KDX220 will improve performance from idle to about 7500 rpm then fall flat just like the stock pipe with no meaningful increase in over rev or higher rpm performance. If you're looking to improve your 220's power delivery from the bottom to top end then a rev pipe is a must. You'll often see the FMF KG-30 advertised as a rev pipe for the 200 and as a torque pipe for the 220 for this very reason. The torque pipe is still a viable choice for 220 owners who focus the majority of their riding in tight technical conditions or for those who want to maximize bottom to mid performance and are willing to give up some upper mid to top end performance in trade. |
|
Originally Posted by denbsteph
I'm gonna pull the top of the cylinder off Sunday, I hope. Relatives are down on the wife's side so I have been locked in, trying to stay out of trouble. I still have not got my shop manual yet, I need to call them some time and get the scobby on "Where it is" I'm assuming I need to drain the Radiator just to get to the top of the cylinder off?, I have not really got down and looked at it. Been doing a lot of research on what the 220's possible faults are. Dennis
|
|
Originally Posted by denbsteph
I still have not got my shop manual, WTF!!! in-laws are still here, took them out to the lake today, cooked some food, talked junk. Had a good time.
|
|
Originally Posted by julien_d
Well, here's how it's been told to me. The woods pipe simply doesn't match up well with the 220's porting. Doesn't do much to improve low end, and kills what little top end there is.
Likewise, the rev pipe does not sacrifice bottom end on the 220, but will add a bit of midrange grunt and over-rev. You could consider it a "torque" pipe for the 220 and a "rev" pipe for the 200. I haven't got personal experience here, so consider that regurgitated information. Here. read this bit from the justkdx.dirtrider.net tech tips section So yes, you can use the woods pipe on your 220. It won't necessarily add much more bottom end than the rev pipe though, and will leave you with a bike that requires short shifting. |
|
Originally Posted by jb_dallas
I bought the bike with the woods pipe installed. Based on the information in this forum, I would have gone with the Desert pipe. I guess I could spend the $200 and have first hand experience with the pipe issue. Maybe I could sell the woods pipe to someone with a 200.
|
. When you are done, wash it until you are certain it's completely clean, and then wash it again.|
Originally Posted by denbsteph
jb_dallas: Thanks for the offer, but right now I'm interested in the rev pipe, based on what I have been reading. I have never bought anything on flea bay, plus I'm gonna give this local guy some business. From what I have heard about him, he is top notch. The guy resides about 20 miles form me, right outside of Henderson NC.
Any KDX riders near Raleigh NC that have found a good jet setting?? |
|
Originally Posted by reepicheep
Oh, and do some research before choosing torque or rev pipe on the 220... a 200 torque pipe is a rev pipe on the 220, and a rev pipe on the 220 is... a mess. Or maybe it's the other way around..... I sorted it all out once and put it here in the archives somewhere.
|
|
Originally Posted by denbsteph
julien_:
That was in reference to the Manual supplement. |
|
Originally Posted by denbsteph
By running you mean, after break in of the new piston? Of course the motor is apart at the moment. I'm gonna get on the carb this morning, after I contact Bike Bandit. I have to get a new phillips just for the carb, the ones I have are 20 years old and a little beat up. Thanks again for the info!!
|
|
Originally Posted by denbsteph
julien_d and sr5bidder:
If I was thinking I would of pulled the chain off while I had the swing arm off but spaced off badly. So I decided to go ahead and pull the master link off and clean the chain. The chain was not taken care of at all. Who ever thought of throwing lube on top of lube on top of lube and thought this was lubing must of been smoking purple cush for the past 10 years!!. So I decided to take the master link off.......yea right. Of all the things I have done in the past two weeks, this was a major pain. I got the keeper off but could not get the link off to save my life. So I decided to put the keeper back on............nope would not go on. Needless to say I tweaked the keeper and in need of another one. ! |
(2 bikes)
I have a little secret for that
|
Originally Posted by denbsteph
O-Rings were in place, all four. I could "Feel" the gap with my finger nail. I agree with using the mushroom technique, but I do not want to have to take off the swing arm again to keep the chain as a whole to do the mushrooming technique. If you are mushrooming the link on the bike, what are you using to withstand the pounding the hammer will inflict?, confused.
I have another concern and I hope it is nothing. When refilling the radiator, is it common for the fluid level to drop several times after running for several minutes? It's not only happening in the Rad but in the resovour (sp). Please tell me I'm becoming paranoid and this is usual. The oil looks good thru the window, no musroom soup. I took the plug out this morning and it was "Wet", smelled like gas, but it was . I hope I have not f**ked this up in any way. All the cylinder and head bolts are torqued to spec. I hope I'm just paranoid, Give me some warning signs and early detection ideas to look at.......I have a bad feeling about this............................ |
|
Originally Posted by julien_d
^^^^^
Changing oil mixture is no replacement for jetting, and should not be used as such. If you want to run 50:1, that's fine. As long as your jetting is good you should not have a problem. However, I gaurantee that you could have jetted your bike to the 32:1 mixture and it would have run even better. More oil in a two stroke will produce a better ring seal, more compression, and more power, BUT it must be jetted correctly for the mix. Den, Yes, what you saw was normal. Especially if you did not use the bleed screws on the head an the LH radiator when filling. |
|
Originally Posted by sr5bidder
BTW allthough I can explain how to fix anything on the kdx, I howeer can not tell you how to not get it to stop from throwing you on your a$$ i really don't understand it myself????
![]() |

|
Originally Posted by jb_dallas
Personally, I would never run a bike at 50:1...it sort of bothers me that my weedeater is jetted for 50:1.
![]() denbsteph I see you are having issues with your chain. To me, a chain is a regular maintenance item, sort of like tires, but a busted tire cant knock a hole in your cases. Just buy a new one and be done. |
|
Originally Posted by julien_d
LOL... learn to ride????
![]() |
|
Originally Posted by jb_dallas
denbsteph I see you are having issues with your chain. To me, a chain is a regular maintenance item, sort of like tires, but a busted tire cant knock a hole in your cases. Just buy a new one and be done. |
|
Originally Posted by jb_dallas
My point is that alot of drama would have been avoided with the purchase of a $45 chain. I think it would have been well worth the $45, all things considered. A chain used constantly in sandy/muddy conditions will wear quicker than one used on dry, packed trails. Also, the tires hardly wear in sand...so...it really depends on the riding conditions. Besides, I wasnt making a comparison of a chain wearing at the same rate as tires...I simply said they were both regular maintenance items.
|
|
Originally Posted by denbsteph
sr5bidder:
I filled her to the full line on the reservoir. I'm leaning towards I did not do a good job of snugging it down. I did not take the KDX out today, waiting for another Air Filter holder. The old one was split in several place's, should arrive Wednesday. Instead I took the FZ1 out today for a little ride.................right at a 500 mile day ride. Took a ride into White Sulfur Springs WV. Then had lunch in Paint Back VA, best Buffalo Burger with in 1000 miles, good ride, great day, some decent twisties. You ride with your reservoir dry?? |
|
Originally Posted by denbsteph
sr5bidder: Sorry to here about the loss.
I'm gonna do some reading on the Reservour tank, get a good sense of what it's true purpose is. |
|
Originally Posted by denbsteph
Still waiting for the OEM air element holder, I wonder if the Japan disaster has slowed the part? I know it's getting ready to hurt the Toyota factories here. Maybe this is a sign, that maybe we should not out source all our fuc&ing jobs and idea's to the rest of the world. Take note Washington!!
|
|
Originally Posted by julien_d
Trials tires are not sized that way. It will be a 4.00-18. The D803 is probably the most popular for trails. If you ride on-road at all or like high speeds consider the Pirelli MT43. I have had my MT43 fitted for nearly 3 years now and just can't wear the thing out. Remember the MT43 is NOT a competition trials tire, but rather a trials type tire designed specifically for trail use.
|
and rubbed the shock for about 40 miles. I ran it at motomountain and it has good traction and then put about 70 miles on road sunday. it is alot tougher on the street than the 803 would be. thinking of getting the mt43?? for the front of the xt if thats what the front is called, I am running 33lbs in the rear but may try to go down to 22lbs
vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013,
Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.
vB Easy Archive Final ©2000 - 2013
- Created by Stefan "Xenon" Kaeser