Home
Basic Dirt Bike How-To's - Video
Dirt Bike How-To's - Video
Living The Moto Life - Video
Bike Tests | Shoot-Outs - Video
Forums
What's new
Latest activity
Log-In
Join
What's new
Menu
Log-In
Join
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Close Menu
Forums
Other Dirt Bike Discussions
MotoPhotos & Photography
[Photog Stuff] Rich, Kawi ...
Reply to thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
[QUOTE="Okiewan, post: 1104533, member: 16119"] Cool, thanks.... IMHO.... there is not as much difference in F/stop in the Sigma 10-20. No idea why? Kawidude's shot still showed shallow DOF in both shots, even at f16. (I'm not even saying this is bad, UWA is known for DOF and that lens kicks A$$ doing what's it's made for. (NOT product photography). I'd say the Sigma is easier to shoot than the Canon. Rich's 10-20 shot at 5.6 was mostly in focus, but that has to do with the angle.. ie; the front of the battery is not far off the focal plane of the chuck. This answered my question. I beieve the EF-S is more sensitive to aperture due to it's distance (back lens) from the sensor. Thanks! [/QUOTE]
Verification
Which ocean is California closest to?
Post reply
Forums
Other Dirt Bike Discussions
MotoPhotos & Photography
[Photog Stuff] Rich, Kawi ...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom