Home
Basic Dirt Bike How-To's - Video
Dirt Bike How-To's - Video
Living The Moto Life - Video
Bike Tests | Shoot-Outs - Video
Forums
What's new
Latest activity
Log-In
Join
What's new
Menu
Log-In
Join
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Close Menu
Forums
MX, SX & Off-Road Discussions
General Moto | Off-Topic Posts
VP Fuel Slams the AMA
Reply to thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Message
[QUOTE="Ryone, post: 1028266, member: 54483"] I'm not sold on it either. I'm just stating that parts/billion is sooooo trace (especially in a 2 gallon gas tank) that it's possible. I totally agree. Passing the buck may not be the best approach. If they provided hard facts instead of pointing a finger, their open letter would read a lot better. I think that since the amounts were all close, it shows that something similar may have happened to all samples. Possibly, as suggested earlier, the samples were collected irresponsibly. Also possible is that the fuel they all used was exposed to a similar contaminant in a similar fashion. It's tough to speculate, but exceeding .005 g/ML by .013 g/ML is still rediculous as far as the rule is concerned, and in NO WAY WHATSOEVER should be consdered as an attempt to cheat by any rider. Ryan [/QUOTE]
Verification
Which ocean is California closest to?
Post reply
Forums
MX, SX & Off-Road Discussions
General Moto | Off-Topic Posts
VP Fuel Slams the AMA
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
Bottom