Hey guys I'm about to get my first bike, I live in nh so will be doing a lot of trail riding. I was wondering if anyone could offer any insite on which of these two I should get. 91 kx125 or a 95 rm125.
However, no matter what the age the biggest issue is condition and wear & tear. The 95 will have better suspension just due to being a bit newer and the advances made but if it is all beat to death and needs money then it won't be worth it.
I had a 2000 Gas Gas and it was great. I didn't feel at a disadvantage and was able to keep up with the same guys riding my 2000 GG as I did on my 2006 YZ450F, even on a very hilly area.
Hey guys I'm about to get my first bike, I live in nh so will be doing a lot of trail riding. I was wondering if anyone could offer any insite on which of these two I should get. 91 kx125 or a 95 rm125.
Thanks for your response. I actually talked to both guys with the bikes and the kx is fully rebuilt and has fmf exhaust already and factory connection suspension while the rm is stock so I think I'm going to go with the kx.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.